The concept of no-self is something I find simultaneously both one of the most interesting and complex concepts in Buddhism. This idea sits right at the center of the practice and forms of the three marks of existence, namely impermanence, suffering and non-self (Sanskrit: Anatta).
I read this passage some time ago and found it to at least provide some entry point for my own understanding:
“From the point of view of time, we say “impermanence”, and from the point of view of space, we say “non-self”. Things cannot remain themselves for two consecutive moments, therefore there is nothing that can be called permanent “self”. Before you entered this room, you were different physically and mentally. Looking deeply at impermanence, you see non-self. Looking deeply at non-self, you see impermanence. We cannot say, “I can accept impermanence, but non-self is too difficult. They are the same.”
Essential to the understanding of non-self is our awareness that self is made up entirely of non-self elements and that there is no separation between self and non-self and everything is interconnected…




















